@COMMENT This file was generated by bib2html.pl <https://sourceforge.net/projects/bib2html/> version 0.94
@COMMENT written by Patrick Riley <http://sourceforge.net/users/patstg/>
@InProceedings{HFES93-win, 
  author =      {Gary Perlman and J. Edward {Swan~II}}, 
  title =       {Color versus Texture Coding to Improve Visual Search Performance}, 
  booktitle =   {Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the 
                 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society}, 
  location =    {Santa Monica, California, USA}, 
  publisher =   {HFES}, 
  date =        {October 11--15}, 
  month =       {October}, 
  year =        1993, 
  pages =       {343--347}, 
  wwwnote =     { 
Also appears in G. Perlman, G. K. Green, & M. S. Wogalter (Eds.), Human Factors 
Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction: Selections from the Human Factors 
and Ergonomics Society Annual Meetings 1983-1994, Santa Monica, California, 
HFES, 1995. 
}, 
  abstract =    { 
An experiment is reported in which the relative effectiveness of color coding, 
texture coding, and no coding of target borders to speed visual search is 
determined. The following independent variables were crossed in a 
within-subjects factorial design: Color coding (present or not), Texture coding 
(present or not), Distance between similarly coded targets (near or far), Group 
size of similarly coded targets (1, 2, 3, or 4), and a Replication factor of 
target Border width (10, 20, or 30 pixels). Search times, errors, and subjective 
rankings of the coding methods were recorded. Results showed that color coding 
improved search time compared to no coding, but that texture coding was not 
effectively used by subjects, resulting in nearly identical times to uncoded 
targets. Subjective preference rankings reflected the time data. The adequate 
power of the experiment along with the results of preparatory pilot studies lead 
us to the conclusion that texture coding is not an effective coding method for 
improving visual search time. 
}, 
}